The Challenge of Life After Mining

There Are Always three sides to a story: yours, mine and the truth.

That reality underscores the important of keeping an open mind – whether mediating disputes, listening to differing viewpoints, or shaping economic policy and programme interventions.

Sound decisions, particularly those affecting livelihoods and long-term development, demand careful consideration rather than rushed conclusions.

Across the globe, many economies have been built on the back of mineral extraction.

While mining has contributed significantly through royalties, employment and, in some cases, infrastructure developments such as roads, railways, water and electricity services, these benefits have largely been short term.

Mining, by its very nature, is finite.

For decades countries in southern Africa, across the continent, and elsewhere in the world have struggled to put in place policies and programmes that endure longer-term sustainability once mining activity ceases in a particular region.

The challenge is not a lack of recognition, but rather the difficulty of translating intentions into inclusive and effective action.

Namibia offers several illustrative examples.

Settlements and towns such as Kombat, between Otavi and Grootfontein, Uis in the Erongo region, and the southern towns of Oranjemund and Rosh Pinah all grew around mining activity.

There are others too.

While efforts have been made to diversify these local economies, the results remain mixed.

It would be incorrect to suggest that no economic transformation has taken place.

Resources have been allocated and genuine efforts have been made, often with significant funding from the mining companies themselves.

Yet the overall impact of these initiatives appears limited, raining questions about alignment, ownership and inclusivity.

Working at Oranjemund this week prompts an important question: is there sufficient alignment among stakeholders to ensure inclusive economic development, or has there been over-reliance on the mining companies to drive transformation while other stakeholders remain less proactive?
Studies and reports have long explored alternative economic drivers for the period beyond mining.

More than a decade ago, proposals were presented to repurpose existing buildings into garment manufacturing facilities operating under a cut-make-and-trim (CMT) model, aimed at servicing the large and South African market.

Tourism and agriculture were also identified as viable avenues for job and wealth creation, offering the potential to secure longer-term economic viability for these towns.

In fairness, it must be acknowledged that work has been done, often funded by the mining sector, to support economic transition.

However, the apparent lack of inclusivity – particularly limited involvement of local communities and entrepreneurs – may be undermining these efforts and diluting their impact.

This is not about finger pointing or blame. As with any complex issue, there are multiple perspectives.

But given the current realities in Namibia’s southern mining towns, inaction is no longer an option.

What is required now is a shift away from repeating the same approaches while expecting different outcomes.

A constructive starting point would be the meaningful involvement of all stakeholders: government, mining companies, local communities and entrepreneurs who already provide goods and services within these communities.

Only through coordinated, inclusive action can these towns build sustainable futures.

– Reach Danny Meyer at danny@smecompete.com

In an age of information overload, Sunrise is The Namibian’s morning briefing, delivered at 6h00 from Monday to Friday. It offers a curated rundown of the most important stories from the past 24 hours – occasionally with a light, witty touch. It’s an essential way to stay informed. Subscribe and join our newsletter community.