Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Banner Left
Banner Right

Investors need new strategies: Researcher

Investors need new strategies: Researcher

BOSTON – Last year’s market meltdown proved once and for all that the theory underpinning most investors’ asset allocation decisions needs to be thrown out, a top Fidelity Investments researcher said on Thursday.

Investors ought to re-examine popular diversification strategies based on ‘modern portfolio theory,’ which holds that performance can be enhanced and risk reduced by spreading money over a wide array of asset classes, said Ren Cheng, senior research adviser at Fidelity.’One fundamental mistake our industry is committing is that we love the clean, nice theory too much,’ said Cheng, speaking at a conference in Boston sponsored by Financial Research Corp.For example, investors believe that splitting money among US stocks, corporate bonds and high-yield bonds provides higher returns and lower risk than a less diversified mix. But the three categories now have so much in common that prices of securities often move in concert, Cheng argued. And all three plummeted last year.Even making the most basic distinction between investing in US and non-US developed country stocks may be useless, he said.’Is this just an artificial distinction?’ Cheng asked. ‘Aren’t we in a global equity environment where everything is mashed together?.’Cheng also ridiculed statements by hedge fund managers and other market players that, according to their models, the extreme events of the past two years were so highly unlikely that they were unforeseeable.’Something with less chance of happening than 50 times the age of the universe happened three days in a row, or maybe there is a better explanation?’ Cheng said. ‘Your theory sucks.’Extreme market breaks are more and more likely to happen now that money can flow so easily among different markets all over the world and different countries’ economies are so interconnected, Cheng said. ‘We should see a higher frequency of what we used to call extreme events – it’s here to stay,’ he said.Cheng returned to Fidelity last month as a research adviser after taking a year off. Previously, he was chief investment officer responsible for asset allocation in Fidelity’s ‘Freedom’ line of target date funds.- Nampa-Reuters

Stay informed with The Namibian – your source for credible journalism. Get in-depth reporting and opinions for only N$85 a month. Invest in journalism, invest in democracy –
Subscribe Now!

Latest News