Now is the Time to Address Humanity’s Impact on the Moon

Human have always looked at the sky, using the stars as navigation guides or for spiritual storytelling.

This insatiable thirst for knowledge, combined with technological advancements, have made it possible for us to dream of travelling in space.

These dreams became more and more real after the the Industrial Revolution, the Second World War, the Cold War and the large-scale exploitation of the earth’s resources.

Dreams of space travel started small with the launch of Sputnik-1 by the Soviet Union, and escalated with the United States Apollo landing on the moon in 1969.

Six decades later, plans are ramping up for space tourism, missions to the moon and Mars, and mining on the moon.

The Lunar Resources Registry, a private business that locates valuable resources on the moon and helps investors conduct the required exploration and extraction operations, notes: “The space race is evolving into space industrialisation.”

According to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Nasa), “the moon holds hundreds of billions of dollars of untapped resources”, including water, helium-3 and rare earth metals used in electronics.

As a group of academics researching various aspects of environmental sustainability on earth, we are alarmed at the speed of these developments and the impacts resource exploitation will have on lunar and space environments.

There is a movement among the international geologic scientific community calling for a new epoch — the Anthropocene — reflecting the enormous extent to which human activity has altered the planet since the end of the Second World War.

Stratigraphers – geologists who study layers of rock and sediment – look for measurable global impact of human activities in the geologic record.

According to their research, the starting point for the Anthropocene has been identified as beginning in the 1950s, and the fallout from nuclear testing.

To shock humankind into preventing the extensive destruction in space that we have wrought on earth, it may be effective to add a ‘lunar Anthropocene’ to the moon’s geologic time scale.

The case for a lunar Anthropocene is interesting. It can be argued that since the first human contact with the moon’s surface, we have seen anthropogenic impact.

This impact is likely to increase dramatically. This is presented as justification for a new geologic epoch for the moon.


This new ‘human epoch’ is hotly debated among stratigraphers as well as researchers in other disciplines.

For humanities researchers and artists, the importance of the Anthropocene lies in the power the concept has to evoke human responsibility for bringing the earth’s system to a tipping point.

In ‘The Shock of the Anthropocene’, historians Christophe Bonneuil and Jean-Baptiste Fressoz argue that the new human epoch entails recognising that technoscientific advances have led to the extent of damage we measure on earth at present.

For millenia, most societies understood the importance of their relationship with the natural world for survival.

But industrialisation and the endlessly growing economy in developed countries have destroyed this relationship.

And now the Anthropocene is also arriving on the moon.

Nasa estimates there are already 227 000kg of human garbage littering the moon, mostly from space explorations, including moon buggies and other equipment, excrement, statues, golf balls, human ashes and flags, among other objects.

An increasing number of moon missions and extracting resources from the moon could destroy lunar environments.

This mirrors what has happened on our planet.

Our throwaway society leads to not only habitat destruction on earth, but also now on the moon and in space.

Without a fully functional earth system we will be unable to survive.

If the intent is to issue a word of caution and pre-emptively shock and elicit a feeling of responsibility on the part of those actors likely to impact the moon’s surface, it may very well be the right time to name a lunar Anthropocene.

This may help prevent the kind of extensive and careless destruction we have caused and continue to witness on Earth. – The Conversation

  • * Christine Daigle is a professor of philosophy at Brock University.
  • * Jennifer Ellen Good is an associate professor and the chair of communication, popular culture and film at Brock University.
  • * Liette Vasseur is a professor of biological sciences at Brock University.

Stay informed with The Namibian – your source for credible journalism. Get in-depth reporting and opinions for only N$85 a month. Invest in journalism, invest in democracy –
Subscribe Now!

Latest News