Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Banner Left
Banner Right

Microsoft fights Japanese anti-monopoly watchdog

Microsoft fights Japanese anti-monopoly watchdog

TOKYO – US software giant Microsoft Corp. said yesterday it will fight the Japanese trade watchdog’s warning over its alleged anti-monopoly law violations in licensing deals with manufacturers using its Windows software.

The Fair Trade Commission sent an official warning to Microsoft July 13, demanding the company drop the clause in licensing agreements that it suspects helps Microsoft unlawfully infringe patents. The clause prevents makers from suing Microsoft or other licensees over suspected cases of patent and copyright infringement in which elements of manufacturers’ own software technology may end up in the Windows system.Microsoft has dropped the clause, although it believes the clause is lawful.But the Fair Trade Commission is demanding the clause be dropped in contracts that were already signed in the past.Fair Trade Commission officials are not certain any patents have been violated by Microsoft, the world’s dominant software company, or other companies who are partners with it.In February, the commission raided Microsoft’s offices in Japan.But several Japanese electronics makers have complained about suspected infringements of patents since December 2000, especially regarding multimedia technologies that are increasingly vital in the industry as audio and video become more widespread on the Internet, according to the commission.Major Japanese consumer electronics companies that are partners with Microsoft, based in Redmond, Washington, include Sony Corp., Toshiba Corp.and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., which makes Panasonic brand products.The disputed contract clause, called the “non-assertion of patents provision,” says companies that sign Windows licensing agreements will forgo the right to sue over suspected patent infringements linked to the licensing.Microsoft objected to the Fair Trade Commission’s findings within hours they were announced.It had until yesterday to respond.The commission now holds hearings to listen to Microsoft’s view before issuing a ruling.The duration of this process remains unclear.If Microsoft decides to appeal, the case moves to a Tokyo court.In 1998, the Fair Trade Commission ordered Microsoft to stop bundling software pre-installed in personal computers in a way that put competitors at a disadvantage.There were no fines.In March, the European Commission found that Microsoft has abused its “near monopoly” with Windows software, levied a record fine of some US$613 million (N$3,6 billion) and demanded changes in how Microsoft operates in Europe to improve competition globally.Microsoft is appealing that decision.In the United States, an appeals court last month approved an antitrust settlement Microsoft negotiated with the Justice Department that was far more gentle than the EU-ordered sanctions.-Nampa-APThe clause prevents makers from suing Microsoft or other licensees over suspected cases of patent and copyright infringement in which elements of manufacturers’ own software technology may end up in the Windows system.Microsoft has dropped the clause, although it believes the clause is lawful.But the Fair Trade Commission is demanding the clause be dropped in contracts that were already signed in the past.Fair Trade Commission officials are not certain any patents have been violated by Microsoft, the world’s dominant software company, or other companies who are partners with it.In February, the commission raided Microsoft’s offices in Japan.But several Japanese electronics makers have complained about suspected infringements of patents since December 2000, especially regarding multimedia technologies that are increasingly vital in the industry as audio and video become more widespread on the Internet, according to the commission.Major Japanese consumer electronics companies that are partners with Microsoft, based in Redmond, Washington, include Sony Corp., Toshiba Corp.and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., which makes Panasonic brand products.The disputed contract clause, called the “non-assertion of patents provision,” says companies that sign Windows licensing agreements will forgo the right to sue over suspected patent infringements linked to the licensing.Microsoft objected to the Fair Trade Commission’s findings within hours they were announced.It had until yesterday to respond.The commission now holds hearings to listen to Microsoft’s view before issuing a ruling.The duration of this process remains unclear.If Microsoft decides to appeal, the case moves to a Tokyo court.In 1998, the Fair Trade Commission ordered Microsoft to stop bundling software pre-installed in personal computers in a way that put competitors at a disadvantage.There were no fines.In March, the European Commission found that Microsoft has abused its “near monopoly” with Windows software, levied a record fine of some US$613 million (N$3,6 billion) and demanded changes in how Microsoft operates in Europe to improve competition globally.Microsoft is appealing that decision.In the United States, an appeals court last month approved an antitrust settlement Microsoft negotiated with the Justice Department that was far more gentle than the EU-ordered sanctions.-Nampa-AP

Stay informed with The Namibian – your source for credible journalism. Get in-depth reporting and opinions for only N$85 a month. Invest in journalism, invest in democracy –
Subscribe Now!

Latest News