• REINHART KÖSSLER and HENNING MELBERHuman remains kept by German institutions as part of their colonial loot were repatriated to Namibia at the end of August 2018 – the third time this has been done.
And once again, the process was marred by serious friction, a clear illustration that both the German and Namibian governments have not come to terms with the problems involved.
Most human remains taken from Namibia were from people killed during the genocide between 1904 and 1908, or related atrocities under German colonialism. It’s not known how many such remains are still in German ‘collections’.
But the repatriation cannot be delinked from the need for Germany to admit to its colonial, state-sponsored crime and what is needed to provide redress.
It took a full century after its colonial dreams of empire ended for Germany to accept – and then reluctantly – responsibility for the traumatic past.
Only in July 2015 did the foreign ministry confirm that the term ‘genocide’ applied to what happened in then ‘German South-West Africa’. This was finally confirmed as official policy a year later.
But bilateral negotiations remain at an impasse. The main unresolved issues are the full recognition of the genocide, an appropriate apology and a willingness for redress on the side of Germany.
During the ceremonies around the restitution of the remains, German official pronouncements remained evasive. This means: No formal recognition of genocide, no official apology, and no mention of any redress.
True reconciliation remains a remote hope.
On 29 August, 27 human remains were handed over. The solemn ceremony took place in a prominent Berlin church. The speech by Michelle Müntefering, Germany’s minister of state at the federal foreign office, offered no deep apology. At the end, she “bowed in deep mourning” and asked “from the bottom of my heart for forgiveness”.
Such wording does not go beyond the individual remorse offered in 2004 by German minister Heidemarie Wieczorek-Zeul. And Müntefering again resorted to quaint wording that obfuscated Germany’s responsibility for its actions, saying
Such verbal acrobatics seek to stress that international law on genocide would not apply to the deeds of 1904-1908, thereby dodging any claims to reparations.
Reparation claims are being pursued both by the Namibian government and separately by descendants of the main victim groups who feel they aren’t adequately represented in the bilateral negotiations between the governments.
The actions by agencies of Ovaherero and Nama include a widely observed court case in New York.
The contested ‘G-word’, and its implications for reparation claims, were not the only sensitive issue. Before the handover of human remains was consummated, conflicts cropped up because of the approach taken by both governments.
In an attempt to keep a low profile on the side of the German state, the ceremony was made the responsibility of the German Protestant Church, acting jointly with the Namibian Council of Churches.
Participation in a vigil was restricted to personal invitations. This violated the fundamental principles of Christian sermons being open to all.
Representatives of the independent Ovaherero and Nama agencies as descendants of the victim groups were only allowed at the last minute to occupy some space in the ceremonies. They voiced their frustration accordingly. As Paramount Chief Rukoro stated on their behalf:
Nor did ongoing tensions abate in Namibia. The human remains were repatriated in the company of Müntefering and the German special envoy to Windhoek. On 31 August a ceremony took place in Parliament Gardens with Namibia’s vice president as the keynote speaker.
While all participants were at pains to maintain decorum, divergent concerns were strikingly articulated. Vice president Nangolo Mbumba followed his government’s line in stressing national unity. He emphasised the need for reparations.
Recognising the contribution of the affected communities, he reminded them that the human remains left Namibia when it was a colony. They were now returned to a democratic country under a constitution.
The representatives of victim communities insisted on a formal apology and reparations. Even the Ovaherero group that cooperates in government negotiations and Namibia’s special envoy, stressed they would evaluate any result against these essentials.
This third repatriation of human remains – the others were in 2011 and 2014 – was another missed opportunity to move closer to some serious reconciliation between Germany and Namibia.
In Berlin Müntefering told reporters, that Germany still has
In an age of information overload, Sunrise is The Namibian’s morning briefing, delivered at 6h00 from Monday to Friday. It offers a curated rundown of the most important stories from the past 24 hours – occasionally with a light, witty touch. It’s an essential way to stay informed. Subscribe and join our newsletter community.
The Namibian uses AI tools to assist with improved quality, accuracy and efficiency, while maintaining editorial oversight and journalistic integrity.
Stay informed with The Namibian – your source for credible journalism. Get in-depth reporting and opinions for
only N$85 a month. Invest in journalism, invest in democracy –
Subscribe Now!






