From kitchen-made hair oils to professionally labelled body lotions lining supermarket shelves, Namibia’s cosmetics industry is experiencing an explosion.
Small-scale makers are becoming registered small and medium enterprises (SMEs).
Social-media sellers are opening retail accounts. Local brands are finally competing for shelf space.
This is a success story, but also a silent crisis.
Behind the rise of ‘Made in Namibia’ beauty lies a regulatory vacuum – one that allows dangerous, badly formulated, and untested products to reach consumers, not only from backyard sellers, but from formal businesses whose products sit on major retail shelves.
BEYOND HOMEMADE
It is a comforting, yet entirely erroneous, belief that dangerous cosmetics are the exclusive domain of fly-by-night vendors.
In reality, the danger has gentrified.
While the untraceable nature of home manufacturers poses an obvious risk of contamination and misuse, the critical problem is that registered SMEs are also flooding the market with unsafe products, often unknowingly.
This occurs because many enthusiastic but untrained entrepreneurs are formulating creams and serums using incorrect preservative systems, industrial-grade chemicals, expired raw materials sourced cheaply to maximise margins, illegally high active concentrations of carcinogenic raw materials, or are simply using unverified recipes copied blindly from the internet.
As a result, these unsafe products are easily reaching major retailers, who often rely on cursory supplier paperwork rather than mandatory lab verification for product safety.
INVISIBLE DANGER, LEGAL VACUUM
Preservatives are the backbone of cosmetic safety. To cut costs, many SMEs utilise cheap preservatives designed for industrial applications.
A common offender is formaldehyde (and formaldehyde-releasers).
While effective at preserving biological specimens or cleaning industrial equipment, it is a known carcinogen.
When used in a leave-on face cream, the consumer is not just moisturising; they are effectively marinating their skin in toxins.
Namibia’s cosmetic industry is hampered not by a complete absence of legislation, but rather by a significant lack of effective implementation of existing laws.
The sector is still governed by the Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectants Ordinance of 1979, a legislative relic written decades before the advent of influencer marketing and widespread online sales.
Despite its age, this ordinance remains the primary legal instrument.
However, the regulatory framework suffers from crucial gaps that compromise consumer safety.
Currently, there is no national cosmetic registration system in place, no enforcement mechanism for ingredient disclosure, and no mandatory requirements for fundamental safety checks such as stability testing or preservative efficacy testing.
Critically, local manufacturers are also not required to comply with good manufacturing practices (GMP).
The practical result is that a cosmetic product can be professionally packaged, meticulously branded, and prominently displayed on shelves and yet remain chemically unsafe because of this regulatory void.
BLIND SPOTS
“But it’s in a reputable shop… it must be safe.”
This belief is the consumer’s fatal assumption.
Retailers, operating on a foundational model of commercial trust, assume the manufacturer has already performed the requisite due diligence and rigorous testing.
However, the manufacturer’s reliance on non-scientific, heuristic formulation processes constitutes a profound failure of professional duty.
This ethical lapse effectively turns ordinary consumers into the unwitting recipients of unverified and potentially harmful chemical products.
The safety chain is broken before the product even leaves the factory.
INGREDIENTS THAT HAUNT AFRICA
The threat to consumer health is starkly illustrated by a chemical ‘Most Wanted’ list consistently surfacing across African beauty markets.
These dangerous compounds, often unlisted or mislabeled, include mercury, a potent neurotoxin often hidden in “whitening” creams that severely damage the kidneys and nervous system.
Also prevalent is hydroquinone, a restricted bleaching agent frequently disguised as an “antioxidant”, which can lead to the irreversible skin disfiguration known as ochronosis.
Compounding these risks are corticosteroids, prescription drugs illegally diverted into beauty products to unnaturally “clear” skin, fundamentally wrecking the immune system.
Furthermore, many products contain formaldehyde (a cheap, industrial-grade carcinogenic preservative) or coconut diethanolamide, an accessible foaming agent linked to potential carcinogenicity.
Finally, the use of Undeclared Fragrance Allergens acts as a silent, primary trigger for widespread contact dermatitis and chronic skin irritation.
These highly toxic substances represent only a fraction of the harmful ingredients that plague Namibia’s unregulated beauty market.
ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ALL
To resolve this crisis, which affects public health and the integrity of the local industry, a systemic reboot is required, as holding only one entity accountable is insufficient.
The government must urgently update outdated cosmetic regulations, moving beyond the 1979 ordinance to mandate product registration and safety testing.
This involves actively testing imports, strictly enforcing label accuracy, empowering inspectors with the necessary resources and legal backing, and implementing deterrent measures, such as penalising repeat offenders.
Simultaneously, SMEs must professionalise their operations by abandoning speculative methods; they must stop copying formulas blindly, invest significant capital in safety testing, undergo proper training in formulation science, consult industry professionals, and rigorously respect chemical dosage limits.
Finally, retailers must become the final consumer safeguard: they must demand safety documents from all local suppliers, meticulously vet suppliers for compliance, immediately stop stocking “mystery products” lacking clear traceability, and summarily reject non-compliant brands to restore integrity to their shelves.
IN SUMMARY
The Issue: A surge in local cosmetic manufacturing is outpacing regulation. Registered SMEs are producing untested products that are entering formal retail chains.
The Law: The industry relies on the outdated Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectants Ordinance 18 of 1979, which lacks mechanisms for pre-market safety assessment compared to the Medicines and Related Substances Control Act of 2003.
The Danger: Without mandatory GMP or lab testing, consumers are exposed to industrial chemicals, carcinogens like formaldehyde, and banned substances like mercury.
The Fix: Updated legislation, mandatory laboratory testing for local products, and stricter supplier vetting by retailers.
- Utji Nguaiko, BSc (Biology, Chemistry) Honours (Biotechnology.
In an age of information overload, Sunrise is The Namibian’s morning briefing, delivered at 6h00 from Monday to Friday. It offers a curated rundown of the most important stories from the past 24 hours – occasionally with a light, witty touch. It’s an essential way to stay informed. Subscribe and join our newsletter community.
The Namibian uses AI tools to assist with improved quality, accuracy and efficiency, while maintaining editorial oversight and journalistic integrity.
Stay informed with The Namibian – your source for credible journalism. Get in-depth reporting and opinions for
only N$85 a month. Invest in journalism, invest in democracy –
Subscribe Now!






