Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Banner Left
Banner Right

Opinions differ on Veterans Bill

Opinions differ on Veterans Bill

THE issue of who qualifies to benefit from the proposed Veterans Bill again dominated the debate in Parliament on Tuesday.

Some opposition MPs felt that the bill should be broadened to include those who fought on both sides of the liberation struggle. Nora Schimming-Chase of the CoD asked whether civilians who remained in Namibia and supported the struggle, such as by giving food and shelter to freedom fighters, could also benefit from grants once the bill became a law.”What about medical doctors who had to abandon their practices for hours to testify in court on behalf of victims who suffered under SWATF or Koevoet? Will those who were forced to fight on the South African side also be accommodated? The way the bill is drafted, surely not,” Schimming-Chase criticised.She further stated that Swapo was not the only political movement fighting for Namibia’s freedom on the political, diplomatic or military fronts.Prime Minister Nahas Angula said in his contribution that if other political movements had seriously tried for official recognition as liberation movements internationally, they also would have received support.”Don’t blame others for your own weaknesses,” he said in the direction of Schimming-Chase.He hinted at the fact that back in the sixties, Swanu – mostly dominated by Herero-speakers – was also recognised internationally, but lost that status.Some contemporary historians say this happened due to infighting and others feel that Swapo deliberately “robbed” Swanu of that status.Nudo member Arnold Tjihuiko wanted to know from the Prime Minister whether the new bill was not an instrument of job creation for Swapo’s freedom fighters only.DTA Chairman Philemon Moongo demanded that those Swapo freedom fighters who were arrested and detained by Swapo during the liberation struggle should also benefit from the grants to be paid out once the new bill became law.”We were fighting at the front, but were suddenly arrested, detained and taken to Zambia by Peter Mueshihange (a Plan commander) and illegally brought to Tanzania and thrown into prison.Are you aware of that?” Moongo – a former Swapo member – angrily asked the Prime Minister, who declined to answer.Henk Mudge of the Republican Party then rose but was constantly interrupted from the Swapo benches.Mudge requested that the bill be amended to incorporate those who had fought on the South African side.”The grants the Swapo freedom fighters are to get is not Swapo money but money from the Government,” Mudge argued, hinting that taxpayers’ money would be used to exclusively pay Swapo freedom fighters.Deputy Justice Minister Utoni Nujoma informed Mudge that SWATF and Koevoet soldiers had earned salaries, while Swapo fighters “fought voluntarily and earned no money all those years.”Nora Schimming-Chase of the CoD asked whether civilians who remained in Namibia and supported the struggle, such as by giving food and shelter to freedom fighters, could also benefit from grants once the bill became a law.”What about medical doctors who had to abandon their practices for hours to testify in court on behalf of victims who suffered under SWATF or Koevoet? Will those who were forced to fight on the South African side also be accommodated? The way the bill is drafted, surely not,” Schimming-Chase criticised.She further stated that Swapo was not the only political movement fighting for Namibia’s freedom on the political, diplomatic or military fronts.Prime Minister Nahas Angula said in his contribution that if other political movements had seriously tried for official recognition as liberation movements internationally, they also would have received support.”Don’t blame others for your own weaknesses,” he said in the direction of Schimming-Chase.He hinted at the fact that back in the sixties, Swanu – mostly dominated by Herero-speakers – was also recognised internationally, but lost that status.Some contemporary historians say this happened due to infighting and others feel that Swapo deliberately “robbed” Swanu of that status.Nudo member Arnold Tjihuiko wanted to know from the Prime Minister whether the new bill was not an instrument of job creation for Swapo’s freedom fighters only.DTA Chairman Philemon Moongo demanded that those Swapo freedom fighters who were arrested and detained by Swapo during the liberation struggle should also benefit from the grants to be paid out once the new bill became law.”We were fighting at the front, but were suddenly arrested, detained and taken to Zambia by Peter Mueshihange (a Plan commander) and illegally brought to Tanzania and thrown into prison.Are you aware of that?” Moongo – a former Swapo member – angrily asked the Prime Minister, who declined to answer.Henk Mudge of the Republican Party then rose but was constantly interrupted from the Swapo benches.Mudge requested that the bill be amended to incorporate those who had fought on the South African side.”The grants the Swapo freedom fighters are to get is not Swapo money but money from the Government,” Mudge argued, hinting that taxpayers’ money would be used to exclusively pay Swapo freedom fighters.Deputy Justice Minister Utoni Nujoma informed Mudge that SWATF and Koevoet soldiers had earned salaries, while Swapo fighters “fought voluntarily and earned no money all those years.”

Stay informed with The Namibian – your source for credible journalism. Get in-depth reporting and opinions for only N$85 a month. Invest in journalism, invest in democracy –
Subscribe Now!

Latest News