Biofuels have more climate impact

Biofuels have more climate impact

BEIJING – Most crops grown in the United States and Europe to make a “green” alternative transport fuel actually speed up global warming because of industrial farming methods, says a report by Nobel prize winning chemist Paul J.Crutzen.

The findings could spell special worries for alternative fuels derived from rapeseed, used in Europe, which the study concluded could produce up to 70 per cent more planet-warming greenhouse gases than conventional diesel. It suggested scientists and farmers focus on crops needing little fertiliser and harvesting methods that were not energy intensive in order to produce benefits for the environment.Biofuels are derived from plants which absorb the planet-warming greenhouse gas carbon dioxide as they grow, and so are meant as a climate-friendly substitute for fossil fuels.But the new study shows that some biofuels actually release more greenhouse gases than they save, because of the fertiliser used in modern farming practices.The problem greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide, is more famous as the dentists’ anaesthetic “laughing gas”, and is about 300 times more insulating than the commonest man-made greenhouse gas carbon dioxide.”The nitrous oxide emission on its own can cancel out the overall benefit,” co-author Professor Keith Smith told Reuters in a phone interview.The study casts further doubts on the credibility of biofuels as a climate cure, following the revelation of other unintended side effects such as rainforest clearance and raised food prices, from competing with forests and food for land.Brazil and the United States produce most of the world’s bioethanol, as a substitute for petrol, while the European Union is the main supplier of biodiesel.Using biodiesel derived from rapeseed would produce between 1 and 1,7 times more greenhouse gas than using conventional diesel, the study estimated.Biofuels derived from sugar cane, as in Brazil, fared better, producing between 0,5 and 0,9 times as much greenhouse gases as gasoline, it found.Maize is the main biofuels feedstock used in the United States, and produced between 0,9 and 1,5 times the global warming effect of conventional gasoline, it said.”As it’s used at the moment, bioethanol from maize seems to be a pretty futile exercise,” Smith said.Nampa-ReutersIt suggested scientists and farmers focus on crops needing little fertiliser and harvesting methods that were not energy intensive in order to produce benefits for the environment.Biofuels are derived from plants which absorb the planet-warming greenhouse gas carbon dioxide as they grow, and so are meant as a climate-friendly substitute for fossil fuels.But the new study shows that some biofuels actually release more greenhouse gases than they save, because of the fertiliser used in modern farming practices.The problem greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide, is more famous as the dentists’ anaesthetic “laughing gas”, and is about 300 times more insulating than the commonest man-made greenhouse gas carbon dioxide.”The nitrous oxide emission on its own can cancel out the overall benefit,” co-author Professor Keith Smith told Reuters in a phone interview.The study casts further doubts on the credibility of biofuels as a climate cure, following the revelation of other unintended side effects such as rainforest clearance and raised food prices, from competing with forests and food for land.Brazil and the United States produce most of the world’s bioethanol, as a substitute for petrol, while the European Union is the main supplier of biodiesel.Using biodiesel derived from rapeseed would produce between 1 and 1,7 times more greenhouse gas than using conventional diesel, the study estimated.Biofuels derived from sugar cane, as in Brazil, fared better, producing between 0,5 and 0,9 times as much greenhouse gases as gasoline, it found.Maize is the main biofuels feedstock used in the United States, and produced between 0,9 and 1,5 times the global warming effect of conventional gasoline, it said.”As it’s used at the moment, bioethanol from maize seems to be a pretty futile exercise,” Smith said.Nampa-Reuters

Stay informed with The Namibian – your source for credible journalism. Get in-depth reporting and opinions for only N$85 a month. Invest in journalism, invest in democracy –
Subscribe Now!

Latest News