09.03.2004

Judge Hoff's judgement disappoints

I WOULD like to express my disappointment and dismay through your newspaper regarding the ruling for the Caprivi 13 accused by Judge Elton Hoff.

Judge Hoff's ruling on the 13 demonstrated to the nation that the

judiciary system in Namibia is in the wrong hands.

These judges are really against our Government and the interests

of the Namibia nation.

 

If we look at this issue critically, the judgement was well

orchestrated to be interpreted as if the Government did not follow

whatever rules or procedures should be followed.

 

But, in fact, Judge Hoff knew about the alleged crimes committed

by the 13 and also (possibly) knew that the State wouldn't release

them due to the type of crime they have allegedly committed.

 

He formulated it (the ruling) in such a way as to allow the

state to re-arrest them, creating room for 'reactionary

institutions' (sic.) to cry foul about the judiciary system, and

painting Namibia as a country which does not respect its own

laws.

 

This is not the case at all.

 

The charges remain: the accused allegedly planned and declared

war against the Government of the Republic of Namibia.

 

Where we supposed to sit back with our tails between our legs,

while our hard-earned peace is being disrupted and our country

being destabilised? We all know the results of war - the disruption

of the well-earned peace, destruction of property, loss of life,

hunger, poverty and other setbacks.

 

Those who wanted to secede the Caprivi had misguided objectives,

were driven by selfishness and hunger for political power and they

- if found guilty - should rot in jail.

 

The security forces should be commended for swift action and the

job well done.

 

They have sent a clear message to would-be terrorists that

Namibia is a well-protected democratic country and whoever tampers

with her sovereignty will feel the wrath of the Namibian law.

 

Namibians! Are we allowing ourselves to be fooled by these

individuals who sit in our own courts, passing judgements that are

against the interests of our nation, and, at the end of the day,

misguided elements within our community call it a court order.

 

Whose interest does the so-called court ruling serve? What made

the 13 accused leave the country under the cover of the night? Who

invited them to the neighbouring countries were they were hiding?

If they had a genuine cause, why didn't they hand themselves over

to the authorities of the countries in which they were hiding? But

were Judge Hoff and his court blind and deaf the day when the 13 -

that some international laws and procedures guiding the extradition

were not adhered to.

 

Which procedures did the 13 follow when they allegedly carried

out their attack at Katima Mulilo? Why should we follow some

procedures by bringing misguided elements to be tried back home?

Who is he (Judge Hoff) to determine the fate and the interest of

the Namibian nation?

 

(Under the Namibian Constitution, the accused is innocent until

proven guilty in a court of law. This letter has been shortened and

edited to avoid libellous statements and possible contempt of

court. Words like 'terrorist' should be reserved for persons

convicted - not suspected - of certain crimes - Ed.)

 

Jordan Atshipara Windhoek

Address supplied

 

These judges are really against our Government and the interests of

the Namibia nation.If we look at this issue critically, the

judgement was well orchestrated to be interpreted as if the

Government did not follow whatever rules or procedures should be

followed.But, in fact, Judge Hoff knew about the alleged crimes

committed by the 13 and also (possibly) knew that the State

wouldn't release them due to the type of crime they have allegedly

committed.He formulated it (the ruling) in such a way as to allow

the state to re-arrest them, creating room for 'reactionary

institutions' (sic.) to cry foul about the judiciary system, and

painting Namibia as a country which does not respect its own

laws.This is not the case at all.The charges remain: the accused

allegedly planned and declared war against the Government of the

Republic of Namibia.Where we supposed to sit back with our tails

between our legs, while our hard-earned peace is being disrupted

and our country being destabilised? We all know the results of war

- the disruption of the well-earned peace, destruction of property,

loss of life, hunger, poverty and other setbacks.Those who wanted

to secede the Caprivi had misguided objectives, were driven by

selfishness and hunger for political power and they - if found

guilty - should rot in jail.The security forces should be commended

for swift action and the job well done.They have sent a clear

message to would-be terrorists that Namibia is a well-protected

democratic country and whoever tampers with her sovereignty will

feel the wrath of the Namibian law.Namibians! Are we allowing

ourselves to be fooled by these individuals who sit in our own

courts, passing judgements that are against the interests of our

nation, and, at the end of the day, misguided elements within our

community call it a court order.Whose interest does the so-called

court ruling serve? What made the 13 accused leave the country

under the cover of the night? Who invited them to the neighbouring

countries were they were hiding? If they had a genuine cause, why

didn't they hand themselves over to the authorities of the

countries in which they were hiding? But were Judge Hoff and his

court blind and deaf the day when the 13 - that some international

laws and procedures guiding the extradition were not adhered

to.Which procedures did the 13 follow when they allegedly carried

out their attack at Katima Mulilo? Why should we follow some

procedures by bringing misguided elements to be tried back home?

Who is he (Judge Hoff) to determine the fate and the interest of

the Namibian nation?(Under the Namibian Constitution, the accused

is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. This letter has

been shortened and edited to avoid libellous statements and

possible contempt of court. Words like 'terrorist' should be

reserved for persons convicted - not suspected - of certain crimes

- Ed.)Jordan Atshipara Windhoek

Address supplied