While I realise that you rely on sensationalist stories to sell
your paper, you must also realise your influence on public opinion
and the responsibility that comes with it.
I find that if you are to highlight the fact that a group of
farmers are defiant about land reform, you should at least
highlight the other part of the story just as well, i.e.
that the farmers are everything but united in this defiant
approach.
That, to me, is a very vital piece of information, which is lost
to people just reading the first couple of paragraphs.
In fact, very few people read complete articles.
In essence, you are adding more dynamite to a time bomb, and
that is not in the interest of anybody, I believe.
Unless you can convince me otherwise? The Afrikaans daily
published a far more balanced article that included most
information that you published plus more.
Siegfried Herholdt
Via e-mail
I find that if you are to highlight the fact that a group of
farmers are defiant about land reform, you should at least
highlight the other part of the story just as well, i.e.that the
farmers are everything but united in this defiant approach.That, to
me, is a very vital piece of information, which is lost to people
just reading the first couple of paragraphs.In fact, very few
people read complete articles.In essence, you are adding more
dynamite to a time bomb, and that is not in the interest of
anybody, I believe.Unless you can convince me otherwise? The
Afrikaans daily published a far more balanced article that included
most information that you published plus more.Siegfried
Herholdt
Via e-mail