16.01.2004

Rundu Beach Project Fails Dismally

ANYBODY visiting the Rundu beach and especially the Rundu river side and the floodplain should be shocked by the litter that spreads deep into the flood plain, while car washing activities continue right up to Sarasungu lodge, 5 km from the newly fenced beach.

Yes, the main (former white Rundu beach) has been fenced off again

apparently to assure better maintenance and stop cars being washed

in the river.

This donor-sponsored upgrading was part of a floodplain scheme

to keep the area clean and preserve the precious Rundu floodplain

for the next generations as an important natural resource area

which will produce income through tourism.

 

However, what we observe now is a total failure of that

project.

 

I wonder how many millions of dollars have been wasted for this?

And why was there no permanent or resident co-ordinator in charge

of it in Rundu so that the scheme was integrated into Rundu's solid

waste management scheme.

 

First: The litter usually concentrated around a small spot (now

fenced off) is now spreading towards former almost untouched beach

areas.

 

The result of the project is the opposite of what was

expected.

 

Second: Apart form the infrastructure and money spent on reports

no programme was planned on social marketing which could have

concentrated on how to limit littering, keep the beach clean

through campaigns and signboards appealing to residents not to

litter the beautiful green landscape.

 

Not a single dollar was spent on dustbins outside the fenced

area.

 

Third: Who came up with the fencing solution? Are we going back

to Apartheid policies where public spaces are fenced and kept

clean, while the rest of the beach is neglected or even destroyed

(because that is what is happening now).

 

Instead of asking N$10 to enter (N$5 per person plus N$5 per

car), the operator who got the tender could have made money through

putting a commission on the beers or food sold, on boat trips,

toilets used etc.

 

Instead he decided to ask an entrance fee.

 

The setting up of a fence by the donor actually encouraged this

behaviour.

 

I suggest the following solution, get rid of the fence and

implement a decent sustainable floodplain management policy with an

aggressive anti-littering programme and improved solid waste

management, which must be extended to the floodplain.

 

It is not the small integrated low-input farming activities that

threaten the floodplain but a project that plans to turn the plains

it into a dumping place and amusement park.

 

I remember the floodplain meeting in 2001 where we were told

about the possibilities of the introduction of small game and

educational walking trails.

 

Where is all that now? Unless the plastic bags and beer and soft

drink bottles are removed, cattle and/or game will be in danger,

and tourists will avoid the place (forever I'm afraid).

 

Most tourists visiting the place are not impressed by the fence

at Rundu Beach, which is spoiling their view, and they are shocked

by the litter around the river, spreading far beyond the upgraded

beach.

 

I appeal to the donor and the Rundu Town Council to reconsider

the way they currently manage the beach and to keep our plains

attractive to tourists.

 

Otherwise the Rundu floodplain will be lost forever.

 

The fencing off of the Rundu Beach did not solve the problem,

but on the contrary made it worse by increasing pollution

throughout the floodplains.

 

- Paulo Zemeke Dasilva - Rundu

 

This donor-sponsored upgrading was part of a floodplain scheme to

keep the area clean and preserve the precious Rundu floodplain for

the next generations as an important natural resource area which

will produce income through tourism. However, what we observe now

is a total failure of that project. I wonder how many millions of

dollars have been wasted for this? And why was there no permanent

or resident co-ordinator in charge of it in Rundu so that the

scheme was integrated into Rundu's solid waste management scheme.

First: The litter usually concentrated around a small spot (now

fenced off) is now spreading towards former almost untouched beach

areas. The result of the project is the opposite of what was

expected. Second: Apart form the infrastructure and money spent on

reports no programme was planned on social marketing which could

have concentrated on how to limit littering, keep the beach clean

through campaigns and signboards appealing to residents not to

litter the beautiful green landscape. Not a single dollar was spent

on dustbins outside the fenced area. Third: Who came up with the

fencing solution? Are we going back to Apartheid policies where

public spaces are fenced and kept clean, while the rest of the

beach is neglected or even destroyed (because that is what is

happening now). Instead of asking N$10 to enter (N$5 per person

plus N$5 per car), the operator who got the tender could have made

money through putting a commission on the beers or food sold, on

boat trips, toilets used etc. Instead he decided to ask an entrance

fee. The setting up of a fence by the donor actually encouraged

this behaviour. I suggest the following solution, get rid of the

fence and implement a decent sustainable floodplain management

policy with an aggressive anti-littering programme and improved

solid waste management, which must be extended to the floodplain.

It is not the small integrated low-input farming activities that

threaten the floodplain but a project that plans to turn the plains

it into a dumping place and amusement park. I remember the

floodplain meeting in 2001 where we were told about the

possibilities of the introduction of small game and educational

walking trails. Where is all that now? Unless the plastic bags and

beer and soft drink bottles are removed, cattle and/or game will be

in danger, and tourists will avoid the place (forever I'm afraid).

Most tourists visiting the place are not impressed by the fence at

Rundu Beach, which is spoiling their view, and they are shocked by

the litter around the river, spreading far beyond the upgraded

beach. I appeal to the donor and the Rundu Town Council to

reconsider the way they currently manage the beach and to keep our

plains attractive to tourists. Otherwise the Rundu floodplain will

be lost forever. The fencing off of the Rundu Beach did not solve

the problem, but on the contrary made it worse by increasing

pollution throughout the floodplains.- Paulo Zemeke Dasilva - Rundu