X
09:00Last update on: 13 Aug 2013
The Namibian
Tue 13 Aug 2013


POLL
What do you think of the renaming and addition of regions and constituencies?
Results so far:
Older Polls
Aupindi’s lawyer withdraws from trial
Werner Menges
THE trial of former Namibia Wildlife Resorts managing director Tobie Aupindi was thrown into uncertainty and disarray yesterday, when Aupindi’s defence lawyer withdrew from the matter after a test of wills with the presiding magistrate in the Windhoek Magistrate’s Court.
Five months after requesting Magistrate Helvi Shilemba to recuse herself from the trial of Aupindi and a co-accused, Antonio di Savino, defence counsel Richard Metcalfe yesterday again urged the magistrate to not continue to preside over the trial.
Metcalfe also argued that Magistrate Shilemba should not hear the testimony of witnesses who had been summoned to give evidence about the allegations on which the request for her recusal was based. If she continued to hear evidence on the allegations, and did not recuse herself at this stage of the trial, his client’s constitutional right to a fair trial would be violated, Metcalfe argued.
He informed the magistrate that he was withdrawing from the matter after she indicated to him that she would not be recusing herself from the trial immediately like he wanted her to do.
“I refuse to associate myself one minute further with this injustice,” an irate Metcalfe told the magistrate before he left the courtroom.
“If this is what justice has come to in Namibia, then I say may God save Namibia,” he added as a parting shot.
Metcalfe also told the magistrate repeatedly that the allegations raised when she was asked to recuse herself are nothing more than allegations at this stage, and that these still need to be investigated by the proper authorities. In the meantime, Magistrate Shilemba cannot sit in judgement on those same allegations which involve herself, he said.
In the wake of those allegations his client has a reasonable perception that the magistrate would be biased against him, Metcalfe also said.
Di Savino’s lawyer, Louis du Pisani, supported Metcalfe in his request for the magistrate’s recusal. After Metcalfe’s departure, Du Pisani told the magistrate that he would now approach the High Court to ask that court to review her decision not to recuse herself.
The recusal application was based on an affidavit, obtained by a private investigator in September last year, in which one Mweukoya Haidula claimed to have heard Public Prosecutor Arrie Husselmann saying that Magistrate Shilemba had said that she would make sure that Aupindi would go to prison, even if there was no proper evidence against him.
Haidula also claimed that she had seen former Namibia Wildlife Resorts board chairperson Jackie Asheeke visiting Magistrate Shilemba’s office and later sitting with the magistrate in a car outside the court, and that she had seen Asheeke’s name on a bank statement which the magistrate had in her possession.
Husselmann and Asheeke have both told The Namibian that the claims made in the affidavit are not true.
Aupindi and Di Savino have pleaded not guilty to a charge of corruptly providing false information to an authorised officer of the Anti-Corruption Commission, and an alternative charge of attempting to defeat or obstruct the course of justice.
They are accused of having lied to ACC investigator William Lloyd by telling him that Aupindi himself had paid a swimming pool company, LIC Pools, N$50 000 for the installation of a pool at his house in Windhoek, while they knew that Di Savino had actually paid for the pool.
It has been claimed that at the time the pool was installed Di Savino was doing business with Namibia Wildlife Resorts, where Aupindi was still in charge at that stage.
In another affidavit which Metcalfe provided to the court in February, the former owner of LIC Pools, Michael Kuhn, stated that Aupindi indeed paid for the installation of the swimming pool himself.
The trial has been postponed to 11 October at this stage.
Five months after requesting Magistrate Helvi Shilemba to recuse herself from the trial of Aupindi and a co-accused, Antonio di Savino, defence counsel Richard Metcalfe yesterday again urged the magistrate to not continue to preside over the trial.
Metcalfe also argued that Magistrate Shilemba should not hear the testimony of witnesses who had been summoned to give evidence about the allegations on which the request for her recusal was based. If she continued to hear evidence on the allegations, and did not recuse herself at this stage of the trial, his client’s constitutional right to a fair trial would be violated, Metcalfe argued.
He informed the magistrate that he was withdrawing from the matter after she indicated to him that she would not be recusing herself from the trial immediately like he wanted her to do.
“I refuse to associate myself one minute further with this injustice,” an irate Metcalfe told the magistrate before he left the courtroom.
“If this is what justice has come to in Namibia, then I say may God save Namibia,” he added as a parting shot.
Metcalfe also told the magistrate repeatedly that the allegations raised when she was asked to recuse herself are nothing more than allegations at this stage, and that these still need to be investigated by the proper authorities. In the meantime, Magistrate Shilemba cannot sit in judgement on those same allegations which involve herself, he said.
In the wake of those allegations his client has a reasonable perception that the magistrate would be biased against him, Metcalfe also said.
Di Savino’s lawyer, Louis du Pisani, supported Metcalfe in his request for the magistrate’s recusal. After Metcalfe’s departure, Du Pisani told the magistrate that he would now approach the High Court to ask that court to review her decision not to recuse herself.
The recusal application was based on an affidavit, obtained by a private investigator in September last year, in which one Mweukoya Haidula claimed to have heard Public Prosecutor Arrie Husselmann saying that Magistrate Shilemba had said that she would make sure that Aupindi would go to prison, even if there was no proper evidence against him.
Haidula also claimed that she had seen former Namibia Wildlife Resorts board chairperson Jackie Asheeke visiting Magistrate Shilemba’s office and later sitting with the magistrate in a car outside the court, and that she had seen Asheeke’s name on a bank statement which the magistrate had in her possession.
Husselmann and Asheeke have both told The Namibian that the claims made in the affidavit are not true.
Aupindi and Di Savino have pleaded not guilty to a charge of corruptly providing false information to an authorised officer of the Anti-Corruption Commission, and an alternative charge of attempting to defeat or obstruct the course of justice.
They are accused of having lied to ACC investigator William Lloyd by telling him that Aupindi himself had paid a swimming pool company, LIC Pools, N$50 000 for the installation of a pool at his house in Windhoek, while they knew that Di Savino had actually paid for the pool.
It has been claimed that at the time the pool was installed Di Savino was doing business with Namibia Wildlife Resorts, where Aupindi was still in charge at that stage.
In another affidavit which Metcalfe provided to the court in February, the former owner of LIC Pools, Michael Kuhn, stated that Aupindi indeed paid for the installation of the swimming pool himself.
The trial has been postponed to 11 October at this stage.
Comment on this article
www.weatherphotos.co.za
Windhoek
3°
24°
0mm
Walvis Bay
9°
21°
0mm
Oshakati
12°
33°
0mm
Keetmanshoop
4°
22°
0mm
Grootfontein
6°
28°
0mm
Gobabis
0°
27°
0mm
(August 13)
View more ...
