BUSINESS - GENERAL
| 2013-08-07
Milk imports to be restricted
Chamwe Kaira
CABINET has granted the Ministry of Trade and Industry approval to institute interim quantitative restrictions on imports of fresh, Extended Shelf Life (ESL), Ultra High Temperature (UHT) milk, buttermilk, curdled yoghurt and other fermented milk products.
This will be done through the introduction of an import permit system to be administered by the Meat Board of Namibia, Cabinet announced in a statement.
The Ministry of Trade and Industry, received a submission from the Dairy Producers Association (DPA) of Namibia, which cited serious difficulties that local livestock farmers and dairy producers are facing due to alleged unfair competition from imports mainly from South Africa.
Cabinet said the short term relief being sought by the local dairy is to be instituted in terms of the relevant provisions of the Import and Export Act of 1994. “It is however envisaged that a permanent control measure will be instituted through an amendment to the Meat Industry Act of 1981 and appropriate action is underway in this regard,” the statement said.
The SACU Agreement allows Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia or Swaziland to impose temporal restrictions on goods being imported into the territories for purposes of protecting their budding or infant industries that are threatened by such imports.
In 2000, Namibia used the SACU Agreement to impose an additional tariff of 40% on all milk imports. The protection was extended in 2008 for another four years up to 2011. “Such protection is therefore no longer in existence,” Cabinet said.
Market size
The size of the Namibian market for fresh milk and long life milk combined is estimated at 950 000 litres per month and about 1,6 million litres per month for long life Ultra High Temperature (UHT) processed milk. Monthly raw milk supplies for the local market originate predominantly from a contribution of 1,3 million litres by Namibia Dairies’ !Aimab Super-farm near Mariental and 820 000 litres from the milk delivery quotas of the independent commercial dairy producers.
Namibia Dairies currently has an estimated 50% share of the local commercial dairy product market. Total raw milk production in Namibia significantly increased as from 1992 to 2012.
The Namibia dairy industry says imports are threatening the survival of the local milk producing farmers and dairy producers.
It is alleged that South African producers are aggressively offloading surplus milk products into the Namibian market at very low or discounted prices. Namibia Dairies says it is unable to match the low prices of imported milk at the current cost it has been buying the milk from local producers given the high cost involved in processing milk in Namibia.
The external threat has forced Namibia Dairies to consider reducing milk intake from the local producers or cattle farmers, a step that has or will have a negative effect on the livestock farmers who are also negatively affected by the prevailing drought.
Finding a solution
In an attempt to find a viable solution and avoid a potential closure of milking operations in the country, a series of emergency meetings took place between Namibia Dairies and the Dairy Producers Association (PDA), during which the parties agreed on an interim arrangement whereby the DPA members agreed to a base price reduction of 40 cents per litre of raw milk delivered to Namibia Dairies as from 1 April.
This interim arrangement will be in place for three months. The reduced price of raw milk is negatively affecting local milk producers and has resulted in a loss of income estimated at N$328 000 per month and, if the causal factors are not promptly addressed, will translate into a loss of N$3,9 million per annum, the Cabinet statement said.
The local dairy producers have also cited other factors that are contributing to the inability of the dairy industry in Namibia to effectively complete with the South African dairy industry. These are synthetic hormones that induce milk production, low transport cost through, which supplies of milk ordered from South Africa are subjected to the same transport costs per truck delivery.
In South Africa, milk is VAT exempted whereas in Namibia milk is subjected to a 15% VAT.
Comments
In response to Hanjo de Villiers:
You raise numerous points however I must state, with respect, that you are completely uninformed. Firstly, you mention that Namibia Dairies has done nothing to improve the milk industry in the 11 years of IIP (Infant Industry Protection), yet they have invested N$140 Million/ US$14 Million in building the !Aimab Superfarm, teamed-u with local farmers to purchase and distribute raw milk whilst partnering with the Mariental Municipality to build homes for their employees to own. More significantly the Superfarm remains to be one of (if not) the largest investment within the Hardap Region since 1990...both in terms of capital expenditure and employment creation. Furthermore you state that they have not improved their processes in this time? Are you aware that this is an ISO 9001:2008 certified company that is internally and externally audited for quality processes? Almost on a quarterly basis? By SABS? Let's not even discuss the new Oshikandela flavors, new product design, logo, screw-top packaging and product partnerships (Ahem...BOS Ice Tea) that have been launched to keep pace with it's competitors. Where are you getting your information from Mr de Villiers? Ultimately you seem to have detracted from the pith of the article: equity. So let me "break-it-down" in layman's terms. When multinational companies like Parmalat (Italian) or Clover (South African) enter our market, they "often" stock our shelves with products that are either manufactured below production cost or priced below retail value in their home markets. This is known as dumping (economics 101) and is the primary reason that our milk industry is taking a beating. Bear in mind that those countries have protected dairy industries (government quotas) and utilize growth hormones which increase milk production per cow, per litre...thus making it cheaper for them to produce raw milk. Namibia doesn't have such laws yet we have policies that allow "them" to dump in our supermarkets! Concerning your last point, that the consumer should be afforded options? Yes, absolutely we live in a free country after all. However, lets ensure equity (fairness) prevails and consider the consequences that a highly deregulated dairy industry may have, not only towards the consumer but on the thousands of workers and their families that will be affected by inevitable jobs losses should it collapse.
Kavena Hambira
San Francisco- California - Kavena Hambira
The GRN is not protecting infant industries, in reality it allow them to monopolise the markets. Recently the Namibia chicken successfully lobbied for such protection, what did they do? They increased the price and we were left with no option but to buy from the only supplier. They are maximising on profit rather then revisiting their strategies and improve on their production cost in order to be able to compete should the import exemption lapse. After the lapse we will hear they are retrenching due to unfair competitions.
The GRN should monitor these industries performance during the import restriction periods. They abuse their positions on the expenses of the consumers. This is a free-markets economic system
I totally agree with Hanjo de Villiers's opinions. - Yaya
For 11 years Namibia Dairies had the chance to gain market share and to improve their processes in order to bring costs down (this was the time when milk imports were taxed at 40%). Did any of the extra import tax revenue go towards developing the milk industry? I highly doubt it. In the time however Namibia Dairies did NOT improve their process, they did not make an effort to bring new products to the market, and they did not lower their prices! If you look at is closely, when supermarket groups had to pay 40% more on top of the regular cost for Clover and other milks all Namibia Dairies did was to match the inflated prices. In the end there is no difference in cost between Namibian milk and imported milk. The loser at the end of the day is the consumer. Besides the cost aspect, this also takes away the choice from the consumer by effectively creating a monopoly, I personally like Clover or Parmalat, its taste is better and in all honesty Clover goes through many more quality checks. Now I would be forced to either buy Namibia Dairies or pay much more that would fairly be expected for Clover. Failing entities should be allowed to do exactly that, they should fail. Thereby allowing other market entrants to improve the process to the benefit of the consumer. - Hanjo de Villiers
I'm very happy with that!thanks nam GRN - daivd sheehama
I am for supporting our own local products,but please not at the expense of the poor.As much as we want to give priority to our locally made products,we shouldn't forget about the poor who can hardly afford a bread in this country.Local should be lekker but pro-poor too. - Nangula Nghiyalwa
Where there is no competition there is monopoly which leads to high prices. Chicken is the example. Please think wise. Our country is really getting expensive day by day.
Less hope the local one wont be expensive like the chicken. - Prince
good one..., i have long stopped buying SA milk... lets stand together and invest in our own country...our own products and create jobs..