|
Written on: 04. 03. 2010 [19:06]
|
|
duku
hiskiel
Topic creator
registered since: 14.02.2010
Posts: 16
|
RDP and the rest of the parties should really be ashamed of themselves now.after being so serious with their case they just lost it again.how can you start something and just lose in the end? it feels so bad seriously.lets shed a tear for them toh. i think i hve some suggestions that they can follow for them to live a better life.
1.quit politics
2.avoid being too serious with funny issues
3.they should go back to swapo
4.theyshould go do farming instead
AND MANY MORE
auties wat do you say?
|
|
Written on: 05. 03. 2010 [14:30]
|
|
endo
endo venuo
registered since: 01.07.2009
Posts: 4
|
Next procedure should be:
Let the electorate decide.
Let the opposition parties publish irregularities what they've found;
the electorate will decide whether the objections were so much hot air,
or whether the electoral commission had been playing with our confidence.
|
|
Written on: 05. 03. 2010 [16:14]
|
|
SandStorm
Kai
registered since: 05.03.2010
Posts: 2
|
there is no next procedure ...
1. the electorate is complacent
2. the irregularities are public, nobody cares anyway
3. justice did not have the opportunity to decide whether there was significant cause for a re-election ... so we will never now and we will never trust in the integrity of the system again.
|
|
Written on: 11. 03. 2010 [16:19]
|
|
Gecko
Hendrik
registered since: 12.02.2009
Posts: 33
|
sandstorm right on ya,
I agree no one cares. Its like having two year olds argue on who gets to swing first. and when the swing breaks then none of then will ever go near a swing again.
|
|
Written on: 12. 03. 2010 [14:58]
|
|
gjensen
Gerard Jensen
registered since: 02.01.2009
Posts: 39
|
Gecko wrote:
I agree no one cares. Its like having two year olds argue on who gets to swing first. and when the swing breaks then none of then will ever go near a swing again.
Still, what#s the essence of this then? We know now that there have been irregularities and as such have to accept the blunt fact that Swapo seems to have no moral trouble whatsoever to rig elections when they deem it necessary. Next step would obviously be to do away with elections completely, as they do not represent a voters opinion but simply display how well (or not so well) Swapo can cheat.
Next, we rename the position of "president" to "king", have Swapo "elect" him for life, ban any political activity that as much as criticises Swapo, its affiliated companies or business partners in any way, tighten up border control to let nobody out of the country and no foreigner ever into it either - and rename "Namibia" into "Myanmar II".
Or what's on the cards otherwise?
I think that the legislative in this country is indeed handling questions that pertain to political ethics in a rather careless way. By now I'm used to seeing that by all those Swapo backbenchers or SPYL based political wannabe's, but that the high court throws out an issue of political ethics based on a mere technicality does not exactly display the kind of maturity I would have expected from those two high court judges.
Kind of like cancelling a whole dinner due to the fact that somone overcooked some side-dish.
Or for that matter: to declare the entirety of Namibia a "Myanmar II" simply because some braindead SPYLoholic starts to throw out an entire organisation simply because one comment didn't go down to easily with him (next we probably read somewhere that he has decided to shoot anyone if he doesn't like the way he looks at him - after all, the level of arrogance displayed by him has to stay unparalleled).
What has Namibia come to - a place where any weirdo can say and do whatever he wants as long as he associates his moronic behaviour with Swapo? Have the last bastions of ethical and moral behaviour in that party finally been defeated, so that by now nobody dares to say anything when someone pees in public while displaying the Swapo banner?
Disgusting is probably the only word that describes this aptly. And I still wonder how they think anyone with half a political mind can take this party seriously if they silently condone that some moron (probably in a "well meant move") rigs the election results in their favour. Kind of like letting a thief carry on, as long as he delivers the goods to you and not someone else...
|