Bin Laden's Latest Tapes Stir Arab Media Debate
By: OpinionEditor's Note: US media focused on Osama Bin Laden's recent taped remarks calling for Iraqis to boycott upcoming elections.
But Arab media are paying close attention to Bin Laden's musings on
exploiting America's Achilles heel: its dependence on oil.
WHAT's interesting about Osama Bin Laden's recent tapes is that
they didn't trigger debate among religious scholars but rather
among Arab economists.
Unlike Western media, which focused on Bin Laden's call on
Iraqis to boycott the scheduled elections, Al Jazeera highlighted
his sudden interest in economics.
Similarly, Al-Quds Al-Arabi, a London-based independent
newspaper, says the latest Bin Laden tape is significant because it
suggests a specific strategy to cause maximum damage to the
American economy.
In the tape aired on Al Jazeera on Dec. 27, Bin Laden reiterates
his call to supporters to target oil installations in Iraq and the
Gulf as a way to foil American plans to control and profit from
them.
And in another tape on Dec 16, Bin Laden uses economic concepts
to explain why the price of oil should be $100 a barrel.
He argues that while the prices of other commodities have
multiplied, the price of oil decreased to as low as $9 per barrel
in the 1990s.
The editor of Al-Quds Al-Arabi, Abdul Bari Atwan, agrees with
Bin Laden, saying the United States is paying much less than the
fair market value for Arab oil.
He argues that the United States manipulates oil prices by
decreasing the value of the dollar and pressuring Saudi Arabia into
pumping more oil.
Some Arab economists, however, question the wisdom of attacking
oil installations in Iraq and the Gulf.
Egyptian economist Dr. Hussein Abdullah strongly argues against
destroying Arab oil installations.
Instead Arabs should make sure that oil is sold at a fair market
value, which he estimates to be $50 dollars a barrel.
Kuwaiti economist Dr. Sami Al-Faraj of the Kuwaiti Center for
Strategic Studies says targeting Arab oil facilities "would be a
waste of Arab resources and thus further weaken their ability to
influence international events."
He adds, "This would only benefit other oil producing countries
like Mexico and Venezuela.."
He cites the sabotage of Iraqi oil fields as an example - Saudi
Arabia and other Gulf countries increased their production quotas
to accommodate the slump in Iraqi oil.
Al-Quds Al-Arabi editor Atwan argues that Arabs should use oil
as tool to advance Islamic and Arab nations, as they did during the
1973 Arab oil embargo when Saudi Arabia punished the United States
for aiding Israel, and "just like the US used economic sanctions to
advance its own national interests."
Atwan says Arabs are sympathetic to attacking oil installations
in Iraq.
This because oil revenues have reached $4 trillion in the last
25 years, but corrupt Gulf regimes wasted most of that money and
didn't do anything for their people.
Sabotage has significantly lessened the flow of Iraqi oil,
forcing the US to reallocate much Iraq reconstruction funds to
security.
It is unclear whether Bin Laden supporters have the capability
to carry similar attacks against the heavily guarded oil
installations in the Gulf states.
Meanwhile, Dr. Abdullah warns that Arab oil producers are
ignoring the fact that they may actually have less oil than what
the Western oil companies are telling them.
"When oil runs out they will turn their back to us and say thank
you," Abdullah warns.
Another significant item overlooked by many Western media in the
recent Bin Laden tapes is his admission that "attacks taking place
in Iraq cost insurgents around 200 000 euros a week."
Bin Laden asks his followers to send money.
But significantly, Bin Laden is no longer using the dollar when
referring to money, as in earlier speeches.
Is he asking Arab countries to stop making oil transactions in
dollars? (Saddam Hussein at one point insisted that Iraqi oil be
sold in euros rather than dollars under the oil-for-food
programme.) This could be a bid to undermine the United States'
ability to buy oil.
Atwan notes that the United States consumes roughly 20 million
barrels of oil per day and only produces 5 million barrels, which
makes it very vulnerable to higher oil prices.
Asharq Al-Awsat commentator Khalis Jalabi notes that because a
majority of all oil transactions are conducted in dollars, the
dollar has not completely collapsed, despite huge American deficits
and military spending.
Bin Laden's suggested economic tactics are provoking economic
debates that are played out in Arab media; clearly, he is now an
influential player in the region.
Al-Quds Al-Arabi newspaper attributed the strengthening of Bin
Laden's role to "the American bloody adventures in Iraq."
Bin Laden calls these adventures "a very rare and precious
opportunity (for Arab and Muslim nations) to get out of dependency
and slavery to the West."
- PNS contributor Jalal Ghazi monitors and translates Arab media
for New California Media (a project of PNS) and Link TV.
WHAT's interesting about Osama Bin Laden's recent tapes is that
they didn't trigger debate among religious scholars but rather
among Arab economists.Unlike Western media, which focused on Bin
Laden's call on Iraqis to boycott the scheduled elections, Al
Jazeera highlighted his sudden interest in economics.Similarly,
Al-Quds Al-Arabi, a London-based independent newspaper, says the
latest Bin Laden tape is significant because it suggests a specific
strategy to cause maximum damage to the American economy.In the
tape aired on Al Jazeera on Dec. 27, Bin Laden reiterates his call
to supporters to target oil installations in Iraq and the Gulf as a
way to foil American plans to control and profit from them.And in
another tape on Dec 16, Bin Laden uses economic concepts to explain
why the price of oil should be $100 a barrel.He argues that while
the prices of other commodities have multiplied, the price of oil
decreased to as low as $9 per barrel in the 1990s.The editor of
Al-Quds Al-Arabi, Abdul Bari Atwan, agrees with Bin Laden, saying
the United States is paying much less than the fair market value
for Arab oil.He argues that the United States manipulates oil
prices by decreasing the value of the dollar and pressuring Saudi
Arabia into pumping more oil.Some Arab economists, however,
question the wisdom of attacking oil installations in Iraq and the
Gulf.Egyptian economist Dr. Hussein Abdullah strongly argues
against destroying Arab oil installations.Instead Arabs should make
sure that oil is sold at a fair market value, which he estimates to
be $50 dollars a barrel.Kuwaiti economist Dr. Sami Al-Faraj of the
Kuwaiti Center for Strategic Studies says targeting Arab oil
facilities "would be a waste of Arab resources and thus further
weaken their ability to influence international events."He adds,
"This would only benefit other oil producing countries like Mexico
and Venezuela.."He cites the sabotage of Iraqi oil fields as an
example - Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries increased their
production quotas to accommodate the slump in Iraqi oil.Al-Quds
Al-Arabi editor Atwan argues that Arabs should use oil as tool to
advance Islamic and Arab nations, as they did during the 1973 Arab
oil embargo when Saudi Arabia punished the United States for aiding
Israel, and "just like the US used economic sanctions to advance
its own national interests."Atwan says Arabs are sympathetic to
attacking oil installations in Iraq.This because oil revenues have
reached $4 trillion in the last 25 years, but corrupt Gulf regimes
wasted most of that money and didn't do anything for their
people.Sabotage has significantly lessened the flow of Iraqi oil,
forcing the US to reallocate much Iraq reconstruction funds to
security.It is unclear whether Bin Laden supporters have the
capability to carry similar attacks against the heavily guarded oil
installations in the Gulf states.Meanwhile, Dr. Abdullah warns that
Arab oil producers are ignoring the fact that they may actually
have less oil than what the Western oil companies are telling
them."When oil runs out they will turn their back to us and say
thank you," Abdullah warns.Another significant item overlooked by
many Western media in the recent Bin Laden tapes is his admission
that "attacks taking place in Iraq cost insurgents around 200 000
euros a week."Bin Laden asks his followers to send money.But
significantly, Bin Laden is no longer using the dollar when
referring to money, as in earlier speeches.Is he asking Arab
countries to stop making oil transactions in dollars? (Saddam
Hussein at one point insisted that Iraqi oil be sold in euros
rather than dollars under the oil-for-food programme.) This could
be a bid to undermine the United States' ability to buy oil.Atwan
notes that the United States consumes roughly 20 million barrels of
oil per day and only produces 5 million barrels, which makes it
very vulnerable to higher oil prices.Asharq Al-Awsat commentator
Khalis Jalabi notes that because a majority of all oil transactions
are conducted in dollars, the dollar has not completely collapsed,
despite huge American deficits and military spending.Bin Laden's
suggested economic tactics are provoking economic debates that are
played out in Arab media; clearly, he is now an influential player
in the region.Al-Quds Al-Arabi newspaper attributed the
strengthening of Bin Laden's role to "the American bloody
adventures in Iraq."Bin Laden calls these adventures "a very rare
and precious opportunity (for Arab and Muslim nations) to get out
of dependency and slavery to the West."- PNS contributor Jalal
Ghazi monitors and translates Arab media for New California Media
(a project of PNS) and Link TV.