11.02.2005

No Easy Walk for Labour

By: Opinion - (Herbert Jauch)

THE new year started with several significant events for Namibian workers.

First, there was the almost usual crisis in the fishing industry

when companies claimed that due to financial difficulties as a

result of the strong Namibian Dollar, high fuel prices and poor

fishing conditions, they had to retrench workers.

Such dismissals always have severe consequences not only for the

workers concerned and their families, but also for the Namibian

economy as a whole, which is already reeling under a massive

unemployment rate of around 40 per cent.

 

Fishing crisis: Fishing companies seem to be ill-prepared for

the cyclical nature of their industry.

 

They tend to quickly shift the burden of economic difficulties

onto the shoulders of their workers instead of fully exploring

other cost-saving measures that might help to avoid

retrenchments.

 

Realising the dire social consequences of retrenchments, the

Ministries of Fisheries and Labour facilitated talks between the

companies and the trade unions organising the industry's

workers.

 

The unions made several proposals how the problems in the

fishing industry could be tackled more systematically and how

solutions could be found without resorting to mass

retrenchments.

 

This approach was also supported by government and the parties

agreed to regular tripartite consultations that would help to

identify problems and to deal with them before they develop into a

major crisis.

 

It is hoped that such consultations will contribute to more open

negotiations and better labour relations in the fishing

industry.

 

After all, Namibia's fish stocks are a national resource that

should benefit the majority of Namibians and fishing companies

certainly have to be reminded of their social responsibilities.

 

Trade union unity: Another significant development in the first

few weeks of 2005 was the expansion of Namibia's second trade union

federation, the Trade Union Congress of Namibia (TUCNA).

 

The Public Service Union (PSUN) joined TUCNA this month, thus

increasing the total number of workers organised by the TUCNA

unions to about 45 000.

 

Combined with about 70 000 workers organised by the unions under

the umbrella of the National Union of Namibian Workers (NUNW), this

means that well over 100 000 Namibian workers are trade union

members.

 

The labour movement thus has a numerical strength that few other

organisations can match but unions will have to translate this

numerical strength into power to influence decisions at workplaces

and in the national policy arena.

 

It is here where labour's influence is currently weak as can be

seen, for example in the debates on privatisation, labour hire and

export processing zones (EPZs).

 

Over the years, the Namibian Government tended to support

business interests and labour will therefore have to review its

strategies how to shift the focus of debate towards the achievement

of social justice.

 

During a recent conference on Black Economic Empowerment (BEE),

for example, the acting General Secretary of the NUNW, Peter

Naholo, reminded the audience that trade unions want broad-based

empowerment programmes instead of the narrow elite-driven model

that only benefits a few individuals.

 

Supporting critics like South Africa's Peace Nobel Price winner

Desmond Tutu, the NUNW has called for BEE programmes that will

benefit workers and their communities.

 

The task of campaigning for policies in favour of workers and

the poor in general is not made easier by the deep divisions that

still run through the Namibian labour movement.

 

The two federations are divided along political lines and

chances of inter-union co-operation are slim as long as they see

each other as rivals that have to be fought at shopfloor and

national level.

 

As long as these practices continue, there is little hope for

trade union unity.

 

Vulnerable workers: Another challenge facing labour is how to

organise vulnerable workers and improve their living

conditions.

 

This group of workers includes farm workers, domestic workers,

security guards, petrol attendants as well as workers in the

informal sector and those employed by Ramatex.

 

These workers tend to be the lowest paid and enjoy the least

protection.

 

Although they are covered by the provisions of the Labour Act,

their rights are often violated - sometimes due to ignorance but

often due to their weak bargaining position.

 

In the face of huge unemployment, they simply have to accept

almost any job under any conditions.

 

In recent years, the farmworkers union Nafwu has made

significant progress in its attempts to organise farmworkers and to

negotiate minimum wages.

 

The first minimum wage was agreed to in 2003 with the farmers

unions (the Namibia Agricultural Union (NAU), representing

commercial farmers and the Namibia National Farmers Union (NNFU),

representing communal farmers).

 

Earlier this year, the launch of a pension fund for farmworkers

was announced.

 

These are certainly steps forward but it remains to be seen how

these measures are being implemented and how they will improve the

lives of Namibia's farmworkers, both in commercial and communal

areas.

 

Progress has been extremely slow for other vulnerable

workers.

 

There are no minimum wages for domestic workers who are hardly

unionised and isolated at their individual workplaces.

 

A minimum wage agreement for security guards was signed recently

between the security industry and the union (Natau), while the poor

wages at Ramatex have remained unchanged since 2003.

 

Thusfar, trade unions have hardly reached workers in the

informal sector and the NUNW is currently exploring ways to

organise this sector.

 

New Labour Act: After five years of discussions, Namibia's new

Labour Act was finally passed towards the end of 2004.

 

It will become operational during this year and will certainly

pose new challenges for unions and employers like.

 

The core changes in the new act deal with the resolution of

disputes.

 

The new Labour Act shifts emphasis away from resolving disputes

from Labour Courts towards the processes of mediation and

arbitration.

 

The recent case of workers being re-instated after having been

unfairly dismissed two years ago, is just one example, which shows

that court cases are slow and often expensive.

 

It is hoped that most conflicts will be resolved through

arbitration and mediation and that there will be less need for

court cases and industrial action.

 

Some unions, however, have expressed concern that the

administrative requirements for a legal strike might become too

cumbersome and time-consuming and thus prevent workers from using

strikes to support their demands.

 

Overall, the new Labour Act is not a radical departure from the

previous one.

 

It is still based on the notion that employers and workers

should solve their conflicting interests through orderly collective

bargaining.

 

Several key demands of labour, such as the inclusion of tenure

rights for farmworkers, the introduction of agency shop agreements

and the outlawing of labour hire companies have not been

accommodated in the new act.

 

Some employers, on the other hand are unhappy with the

provisions granting a minimum of five days compassionate leave and

24 working days annual leave.

 

The new Labour Act merely provides the framework for labour

relations while trade unions will still have to build their own

strength and develop effective strategies to recruit and retain

members, and to service them effectively.

 

Unions will also have to raise their voice in the political

arena and advocate for the interests of those who are still poor

and marginalised.

 

These are some of the immediate challenges and there is

certainly no easy walk for labour in 2005.

 

* This article has been written for The Namibian by Herbert

Jauch of the Labour Resource and Research Institute (LaRRI)

 

Such dismissals always have severe consequences not only for the

workers concerned and their families, but also for the Namibian

economy as a whole, which is already reeling under a massive

unemployment rate of around 40 per cent.Fishing crisis: Fishing

companies seem to be ill-prepared for the cyclical nature of their

industry.They tend to quickly shift the burden of economic

difficulties onto the shoulders of their workers instead of fully

exploring other cost-saving measures that might help to avoid

retrenchments.Realising the dire social consequences of

retrenchments, the Ministries of Fisheries and Labour facilitated

talks between the companies and the trade unions organising the

industry's workers.The unions made several proposals how the

problems in the fishing industry could be tackled more

systematically and how solutions could be found without resorting

to mass retrenchments.This approach was also supported by

government and the parties agreed to regular tripartite

consultations that would help to identify problems and to deal with

them before they develop into a major crisis.It is hoped that such

consultations will contribute to more open negotiations and better

labour relations in the fishing industry.After all, Namibia's fish

stocks are a national resource that should benefit the majority of

Namibians and fishing companies certainly have to be reminded of

their social responsibilities.Trade union unity: Another

significant development in the first few weeks of 2005 was the

expansion of Namibia's second trade union federation, the Trade

Union Congress of Namibia (TUCNA).The Public Service Union (PSUN)

joined TUCNA this month, thus increasing the total number of

workers organised by the TUCNA unions to about 45 000.Combined with

about 70 000 workers organised by the unions under the umbrella of

the National Union of Namibian Workers (NUNW), this means that well

over 100 000 Namibian workers are trade union members.The labour

movement thus has a numerical strength that few other organisations

can match but unions will have to translate this numerical strength

into power to influence decisions at workplaces and in the national

policy arena.It is here where labour's influence is currently weak

as can be seen, for example in the debates on privatisation, labour

hire and export processing zones (EPZs).Over the years, the

Namibian Government tended to support business interests and labour

will therefore have to review its strategies how to shift the focus

of debate towards the achievement of social justice.During a recent

conference on Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), for example, the

acting General Secretary of the NUNW, Peter Naholo, reminded the

audience that trade unions want broad-based empowerment programmes

instead of the narrow elite-driven model that only benefits a few

individuals.Supporting critics like South Africa's Peace Nobel

Price winner Desmond Tutu, the NUNW has called for BEE programmes

that will benefit workers and their communities.The task of

campaigning for policies in favour of workers and the poor in

general is not made easier by the deep divisions that still run

through the Namibian labour movement.The two federations are

divided along political lines and chances of inter-union

co-operation are slim as long as they see each other as rivals that

have to be fought at shopfloor and national level.As long as these

practices continue, there is little hope for trade union

unity.Vulnerable workers: Another challenge facing labour is how to

organise vulnerable workers and improve their living

conditions.This group of workers includes farm workers, domestic

workers, security guards, petrol attendants as well as workers in

the informal sector and those employed by Ramatex.These workers

tend to be the lowest paid and enjoy the least protection.Although

they are covered by the provisions of the Labour Act, their rights

are often violated - sometimes due to ignorance but often due to

their weak bargaining position.In the face of huge unemployment,

they simply have to accept almost any job under any conditions.In

recent years, the farmworkers union Nafwu has made significant

progress in its attempts to organise farmworkers and to negotiate

minimum wages.The first minimum wage was agreed to in 2003 with the

farmers unions (the Namibia Agricultural Union (NAU), representing

commercial farmers and the Namibia National Farmers Union (NNFU),

representing communal farmers).Earlier this year, the launch of a

pension fund for farmworkers was announced.These are certainly

steps forward but it remains to be seen how these measures are

being implemented and how they will improve the lives of Namibia's

farmworkers, both in commercial and communal areas.Progress has

been extremely slow for other vulnerable workers.There are no

minimum wages for domestic workers who are hardly unionised and

isolated at their individual workplaces.A minimum wage agreement

for security guards was signed recently between the security

industry and the union (Natau), while the poor wages at Ramatex

have remained unchanged since 2003.Thusfar, trade unions have

hardly reached workers in the informal sector and the NUNW is

currently exploring ways to organise this sector.New Labour Act:

After five years of discussions, Namibia's new Labour Act was

finally passed towards the end of 2004.It will become operational

during this year and will certainly pose new challenges for unions

and employers like.The core changes in the new act deal with the

resolution of disputes.The new Labour Act shifts emphasis away from

resolving disputes from Labour Courts towards the processes of

mediation and arbitration.The recent case of workers being

re-instated after having been unfairly dismissed two years ago, is

just one example, which shows that court cases are slow and often

expensive.It is hoped that most conflicts will be resolved through

arbitration and mediation and that there will be less need for

court cases and industrial action.Some unions, however, have

expressed concern that the administrative requirements for a legal

strike might become too cumbersome and time-consuming and thus

prevent workers from using strikes to support their

demands.Overall, the new Labour Act is not a radical departure from

the previous one.It is still based on the notion that employers and

workers should solve their conflicting interests through orderly

collective bargaining.Several key demands of labour, such as the

inclusion of tenure rights for farmworkers, the introduction of

agency shop agreements and the outlawing of labour hire companies

have not been accommodated in the new act.Some employers, on the

other hand are unhappy with the provisions granting a minimum of

five days compassionate leave and 24 working days annual leave.The

new Labour Act merely provides the framework for labour relations

while trade unions will still have to build their own strength and

develop effective strategies to recruit and retain members, and to

service them effectively.Unions will also have to raise their voice

in the political arena and advocate for the interests of those who

are still poor and marginalised.These are some of the immediate

challenges and there is certainly no easy walk for labour in 2005.*

This article has been written for The Namibian by Herbert Jauch of

the Labour Resource and Research Institute (LaRRI)