Moore's two-hour anti-George W Bush tirade, Fahrenheit 9/11, which
aired on M-Net on Monday night, showed more than just a corrupt
president.
It exposed what American voters will allow their presidents to
get away with.
The French loved this documentary.
And, reportedly, they know about cinema.
Cinematically, Fahrenheit 9/11 is long-winded.
In spite of moments of pure brilliance - Britney Spears, making
a goofball of herself and George W Bush forgetting that well-known
Texas saying - the editing is tedious.
I mean, enough of that crying woman already.
Moore's narrative speculations are often thin and, at times,
absurd - "What is George W thinking here?" Journalistically, Moore
is a hack.
He leads his subjects - "Wow, that's a lot of money, isn't it?"
- and quotes (or edits) the president's men out of context
repeatedly.
So did the French get it wrong? Factually, Moore's ducks appear
to be in a row.
Consider this:no-one has, so far, bashed the facts of this film
- just Moore's approach.
He convincingly portrays George W Bush as a brazen crook and a
flagrant liar.
Moore portrays the average American as a slightly retarded
Forrest Gump, willing to believe anything and everything.
He convincingly shows that war in Iraq is indeed about oil money
- not world peace.
Moore, unwittingly, shows that George W Bush is perhaps not as
dumb as people think.
Sure, Bush fumbles his sentences, but one is left with the
impression of a sinister schemer rather than a dullard - a man
whose devious mind simply works faster than his Texas mouth.
So the French loved Moore's exposé - in spite of its
cinematic and journalistic flaws.
You can't blame them.
This documentary should make even Namibians sit upright.
Consider the horrors an American nation - with a multi-coloured
cross around the neck - is willing to let its presidents get away
with.
This film is not about Bush.
It's about the American voter.
And do you really want Britney Spears to police the world?
It exposed what American voters will allow their presidents to get
away with.The French loved this documentary.And, reportedly, they
know about cinema.Cinematically, Fahrenheit 9/11 is long-winded.In
spite of moments of pure brilliance - Britney Spears, making a
goofball of herself and George W Bush forgetting that well-known
Texas saying - the editing is tedious.I mean, enough of that crying
woman already.Moore's narrative speculations are often thin and, at
times, absurd - "What is George W thinking here?" Journalistically,
Moore is a hack.He leads his subjects - "Wow, that's a lot of
money, isn't it?" - and quotes (or edits) the president's men out
of context repeatedly.So did the French get it wrong? Factually,
Moore's ducks appear to be in a row.Consider this:no-one has, so
far, bashed the facts of this film - just Moore's approach.He
convincingly portrays George W Bush as a brazen crook and a
flagrant liar.Moore portrays the average American as a slightly
retarded Forrest Gump, willing to believe anything and
everything.He convincingly shows that war in Iraq is indeed about
oil money - not world peace.Moore, unwittingly, shows that George W
Bush is perhaps not as dumb as people think.Sure, Bush fumbles his
sentences, but one is left with the impression of a sinister
schemer rather than a dullard - a man whose devious mind simply
works faster than his Texas mouth.So the French loved Moore's
exposé - in spite of its cinematic and journalistic
flaws.You can't blame them.This documentary should make even
Namibians sit upright.Consider the horrors an American nation -
with a multi-coloured cross around the neck - is willing to let its
presidents get away with.This film is not about Bush.It's about the
American voter.And do you really want Britney Spears to police the
world?