This is the not the first, and it probably won't be the last
hearing of its kind, but unless action is taken after conclusion of
the commission, there is absolutely no point whatsoever in going
through this kind of exercise in the future.
The RFA and RA hearings, like several that have preceded them,
have already revealed widescale maladministration, misappropriation
and incompetency among others, and to the huge losses that have
been incurred to the state and the taxpayer in this way, must be
added the cost of the hearings itself, which is also likely to be
quite considerable.
We do need to be asking ourselves the question as to what point
is being served by undertaking one commission of inquiry after the
other, to prove what we largely already know: that vast amounts of
money are disappearing into a bottomless pit, primarily in
state-owned enterprises of this kind, due to a range of different
reasons, from outright theft and fraud to mismanagement and plain
greed.
Again, this is a question that has been asked in the past,
frequently in fact by this newspaper, but answers are never
forthcoming.
This again indicates the lack of transparency and accountability
on the part of our ruling elite.
Hearings of this kind are nothing more than expensive
window-dressing exercises, designed to give the impression that
something is being done about corruption and mismanagement, but at
the end of the day, the story ends right there.
An election year faces us, and it is with regret that we notes
that problem areas such as these play little or no role as far as
either the electorate or those seeking re-election themselves are
concerned.
Those appearing before the commission may weep, for one reason
or another, but it is the taxpayers of this country, ultimately,
who should be shedding tears over the incessant and ongoing
revelations of this kind.
What type of people are we putting in positions of power and
accountability, both in our Government and through them, in our
state-owned enterprises? Is it not time that we can ask these
questions and expect answers? The reports of most of the various
commissions of inquiry go directly to the President for his
scrutiny and recommendations.
Why is it that the matter always seems to end there? As a
consequence people are seen to be getting away with a myriad of
misdeeds.
And these are inevitably prominent people in our society, paid
huge salaries, only to further misappropriate at the expense of the
country and its people.
We keep hearing the same tired old litany that resources are
scarce, and there is never enough money to fund pressing
socio-economic priorities.
Yet resources are plentiful enough it seems, for us to turn a
blind eye to incidences where they are abused.
To even the most undiscerning eye, this makes no sense
whatsoever.
We would therefore appeal to our head of state, President Sam
Nujoma, to see to it that action is taken timeously against
culprits who are guilty of stealing and/or mismanaging our precious
resources.
At least in this manner the high costs of hearings of this
nature would be justified and hopefully, through follow-up actions,
some of the monies can be retrieved.
To leave matters such as these too long, means that action comes
too little and too late.
The RFA and RA hearings, like several that have preceded them, have
already revealed widescale maladministration, misappropriation and
incompetency among others, and to the huge losses that have been
incurred to the state and the taxpayer in this way, must be added
the cost of the hearings itself, which is also likely to be quite
considerable. We do need to be asking ourselves the question as to
what point is being served by undertaking one commission of inquiry
after the other, to prove what we largely already know: that vast
amounts of money are disappearing into a bottomless pit, primarily
in state-owned enterprises of this kind, due to a range of
different reasons, from outright theft and fraud to mismanagement
and plain greed. Again, this is a question that has been asked in
the past, frequently in fact by this newspaper, but answers are
never forthcoming. This again indicates the lack of transparency
and accountability on the part of our ruling elite. Hearings of
this kind are nothing more than expensive window-dressing
exercises, designed to give the impression that something is being
done about corruption and mismanagement, but at the end of the day,
the story ends right there. An election year faces us, and it is
with regret that we notes that problem areas such as these play
little or no role as far as either the electorate or those seeking
re-election themselves are concerned. Those appearing before the
commission may weep, for one reason or another, but it is the
taxpayers of this country, ultimately, who should be shedding tears
over the incessant and ongoing revelations of this kind. What type
of people are we putting in positions of power and accountability,
both in our Government and through them, in our state-owned
enterprises? Is it not time that we can ask these questions and
expect answers? The reports of most of the various commissions of
inquiry go directly to the President for his scrutiny and
recommendations. Why is it that the matter always seems to end
there? As a consequence people are seen to be getting away with a
myriad of misdeeds. And these are inevitably prominent people in
our society, paid huge salaries, only to further misappropriate at
the expense of the country and its people. We keep hearing the same
tired old litany that resources are scarce, and there is never
enough money to fund pressing socio-economic priorities. Yet
resources are plentiful enough it seems, for us to turn a blind eye
to incidences where they are abused. To even the most undiscerning
eye, this makes no sense whatsoever. We would therefore appeal to
our head of state, President Sam Nujoma, to see to it that action
is taken timeously against culprits who are guilty of stealing
and/or mismanaging our precious resources. At least in this manner
the high costs of hearings of this nature would be justified and
hopefully, through follow-up actions, some of the monies can be
retrieved. To leave matters such as these too long, means that
action comes too little and too late.