06.08.2004

Political Perspective

By: GWEN LISTER

I GUESS it should come as no surprise that a number of National Council members want restrictions on the media. Maybe someone should point out to them that the guarantees of freedom of speech and expression apply to their own less-than-intelligent comments as much as they do to the press.

A curb on us for reporting much of the rubbish that is spoken there

would probably be a good way to embark on the

called-for-restrictions, since it's people like this who are mostly

responsible for spreading fear and loathing...

IMAGINE, some of them actually 'pleading' with the Minister of

Information and Broadcasting to impose restrictions, particularly

on the print media, for among others, the following

infractions:

* being everywhere (?!)

* using vulgar language

* inviting 'danger' to the country

* spreading 'separatist' news

* 'abusing' leaders

* being agencies of other countries

* misquoting people

* 'killing' the news I'd like to invite those NC members who are

even vaguely interested in formulating educated opinions in

Parliament, particularly on a such a cornerstone democratic issue

as free speech and the press, to spend a day with us to see how the

print media operates and to ask us any questions.

 

Again, I have to return to my often-expressed lament.

 

Can they try, in the process of speaking from a public platform,

to also acquaint themselves with the country's Constitution.

 

Freedom of speech and press are entrenched in our Bill of Rights

which is both enforceable by the courts and protected from erosion.

i.e. you can't take them away.

 

Well, I guess you could, but you shouldn't! I say this in case

the concept of further infringement on these rights falls on more

fertile ground in the ruling party.

 

Already it is a worrying trend.

 

Not the ongoing unsubstantiated nonsense about the media, but

the fact that sectors of the ruling party are becoming more and

more intolerant, and often exhibit their own ignorance in the

process.

 

They tend to forget they are given immunity for the nonsense

they often spout in Parliament.

 

The media don't enjoy quite the same carte blanche.

 

Why do they continue to harp on and use the media as the

whipping boy for all ills in this country? Forgetting all the good

that they do.

 

Airing people's views for one, even when they are

inconsequential or foolish.

 

Exposing people's hardships and often succeeding in getting them

assistance in the process:whether it's the water crisis in Katima

or a family shack burning down in Okuryangava.

 

Aiding in the task of educating our nation.

 

Being a conduit between government and people and facilitating

the flow of information from one to the other and vice versa.

 

And, yes, exposing wrongdoing in Government and elsewhere, and

taking our leaders to task when they spout the nonsense they often

do.

 

It's not the media that make inflammatory comments or risk

setting the country alight, it's the people - often the leadership

that we report on - who do this quite adequately by themselves.

 

And unlike them, when we err, we correct our mistakes, and if

that doesn't suffice, we face prosecution in the courts.

 

That's why we invite MPs (especially those who are vocal on a

subject they know little to nothing about) to come and see for

themselves just how the media operates.

 

Perhaps it will contribute to some kind of understanding on

their part.

 

Truly, if we aspire to anything at all in this country, such as

making of ourselves an informed nation, then let us try to promote

literacy and understanding, rather than foolishly call for the

erosion of rights which many fought so hard to entrench.

 

IMAGINE, some of them actually 'pleading' with the Minister of

Information and Broadcasting to impose restrictions, particularly

on the print media, for among others, the following

infractions:

* being everywhere (?!)

* using vulgar language

* inviting 'danger' to the country

* spreading 'separatist' news

* 'abusing' leaders

* being agencies of other countries

* misquoting people

* 'killing' the news I'd like to invite those NC members who are

even vaguely interested in formulating educated opinions in

Parliament, particularly on a such a cornerstone democratic issue

as free speech and the press, to spend a day with us to see how the

print media operates and to ask us any questions.Again, I have to

return to my often-expressed lament.Can they try, in the process of

speaking from a public platform, to also acquaint themselves with

the country's Constitution.Freedom of speech and press are

entrenched in our Bill of Rights which is both enforceable by the

courts and protected from erosion. i.e. you can't take them

away.Well, I guess you could, but you shouldn't! I say this in case

the concept of further infringement on these rights falls on more

fertile ground in the ruling party.Already it is a worrying

trend.Not the ongoing unsubstantiated nonsense about the media, but

the fact that sectors of the ruling party are becoming more and

more intolerant, and often exhibit their own ignorance in the

process.They tend to forget they are given immunity for the

nonsense they often spout in Parliament.The media don't enjoy quite

the same carte blanche.Why do they continue to harp on and use the

media as the whipping boy for all ills in this country? Forgetting

all the good that they do.Airing people's views for one, even when

they are inconsequential or foolish.Exposing people's hardships and

often succeeding in getting them assistance in the process:whether

it's the water crisis in Katima or a family shack burning down in

Okuryangava.Aiding in the task of educating our nation.Being a

conduit between government and people and facilitating the flow of

information from one to the other and vice versa.And, yes, exposing

wrongdoing in Government and elsewhere, and taking our leaders to

task when they spout the nonsense they often do.It's not the media

that make inflammatory comments or risk setting the country alight,

it's the people - often the leadership that we report on - who do

this quite adequately by themselves.And unlike them, when we err,

we correct our mistakes, and if that doesn't suffice, we face

prosecution in the courts.That's why we invite MPs (especially

those who are vocal on a subject they know little to nothing about)

to come and see for themselves just how the media operates.Perhaps

it will contribute to some kind of understanding on their

part.Truly, if we aspire to anything at all in this country, such

as making of ourselves an informed nation, then let us try to

promote literacy and understanding, rather than foolishly call for

the erosion of rights which many fought so hard to entrench.